Phil Burton-Cartledge explicitly supports Eduard Bernstein? Colour me unsurprised:

PHIL HAMITON TWITTER PIC TRISTRAM HUNT RESEARCHER TRISTRAM HUNT PETER MANSON PAL article-1263222-08FB184F000005DC-504_224x423 PETER MANDELSON TONY BLAIR

One of John Chamberlain’s Three Stooges entryists in Peter Taaffe’s Socialist Party (the others being Harry Paterson and Lawrie Coombes) is today singing the praise of the father of revisionism: Eduard Bernstein.

Well, he has been a bag carrier for an upper class twit friend of Lord Peter Mandelson, someone who found himself parachuted into Phil Burton-Cartledge’s seat against the wishes of the local members of his party, so I guess nothing should surprise us about Phil.

Slightly nauseating that he tries to enlist the great Antonio Gramsci alongside Lord Mandelson’s mates and Eduard Bernstein into his love affair with pro-capitalist revisionism though.

Monday, 4 March 2013

Bernstein on Capitalist Development

I haven’t forgotten I’m supposed to be writing about Bernstein. Needless to say, rereading Evolutionary Socialism some 16 years after first doing so is proving fascinating. Of that another time. But in lieu of a proper blog tonight, here’s an interesting comment on capitalist development and material interest:

… the point of economic development attained today leaves the ideological, and especially the ethical, factors greater space for independent activity than was formerly the case. In consequence of this the interdependency of cause and effect between technical, economic evolution, and the evolution of other social tendencies is becoming always more direct, and from that the necessities of the first are losing much of their power of dictating the form of the latter. – Eduard Bernstein 1909, pp 15-16

Translated into contemporary Marx-speak, Bernstein clearly grasped that the relative autonomy of what we have traditionally called superstructural phenomena grows as capitalism develops. It’s one of those neat ironies of history – the more capitalism drives social development, the less the fruits of that evolution are directly dependent on and determined by the structural tendencies of capitalist economics. As bourgeois and proletarians struggle over their material interests and benefit from the successful prosecution of them, the less that conflict overtly plays a part in conditioning the outlooks of strata and classes. In many ways, this insight precedes the arguments underpinning post-materialism by 70 or 80 years, and implicitly draws attention to cultural struggle long before Gramsci did so.

Not bad for a renegade.

Posted by Phil at 18:46

This entry was posted in politics, Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s