Chris Harman on the limitations of Stuart Hall’s ideas [1986]:

What would Harman do?

Chris Harman

Owen Jones marks the death of Stuart Hall thus:

  • The cultural theorist Stuart Hall had a big impact on young(er) socialists like me, as well as a previous generation. A true giant of the left who’ll be missed.

https://www.facebook.com/owenpeterjones/posts/10100729030519159?stream_ref=10

This poses a set of problems for me. I disagree. Very, very strongly. In general, I am not keen on speaking ill of the dead during a brief period to allow family and friends to grieve in peace, regardless of the politics and/or class of the deceased.

That truce is not unbreakable. It was shredded by Britain’s Tory Establishment when Thatcher died. It takes two to agree a truce, and it was Maggie Thatcher’s supporters who are responsible for the orgy of tastelessness that followed. It was Chris Patten’s and Rupert Murdoch’s reactionary liars who provoked it.

Stuart Hall had a big impact on socialists like Owen Jones? Seriously? I was politically active when this giant of Eurocommunism had a big impact. He was one of the generals of the revisionist onslaught on the big battalions of the workers’ movement, dragging us away from the radicalism of the Bennite years. That was when we had extra-parliamentary struggles like the Miners Strike. Back then, socialists like Owen Jones had class warriors in parliament, including the likes of David Blunkett.

Stuart Hall, alongside Eric Hobsbawn, helped usher in talk about a cross-class, popular front coalition government.. These people argued for negotiating peace with the anti-socialist rats who went on to form the Liberal Democrats, and even so-called left-wing Tories, like Edward Heath.

Stuart Hall ushered in the age of witch hunter general Neil Kinnock, of Tony Blair, and Ed Miliband. Stuart Hall formed a key link in the chain that the left has to break once and for all.

Owen Jones ought to know better. If he doesn’t appreciate the damage Stuart Hall did to the workers’ movement that he wants to speak on behalf of, he needs to be brought up to speed. And pronto. If he does know, then he should not use the “don’t speak ill of the dead” mantra to join in the manufacture of a myth. That is going too far.

The greatest Marxist I ever met was Chris Harman. He discussed some of Stuart Hall’s inadequacies in the following article back in 1986. He did so by generalizing our from the real ideas of Antonio Gramsci, rather than the Eurocommunist drivel that polluted Martin Jacques’ abysmal Marxism Today. Stuart Hall’s influence on the left was not a positive one. It was never one bit helpful to the real left, the socialist left, the anti-capitalist left….

  • A BIG SECTION of the left has been beguiled by a horrific myth for the last five years. They have come to believe that Thatcherism has tapped a deep well spring of reactionary, authoritarian attitudes among the mass of people.
  • Once you accept this myth of ‘authoritarian populism’ there are only two things you can do. You can abandon hope of achieving any sort of positive social change. Or you can begin making concessions to reactionary, authoritarian attitudes in an effort to occupy the ‘main ground’ of political debate.
  • This second path has been the one followed first by the Eurocommunist wing of the Communist Party, by independent left academics like Stuart Hall who have moved sharply to the right to join the Marxism Today circus and, most recently, by large numbers of Tony Benn’s one time supporters.
  • But is the myth itself correct?
  • Those of us who have stuck to Marxism have always argued against the myth on the grounds that people usually adhere to bundles of quite contradictory ideas. They accept much of what the media tell them. But they also accept attitudes which derive from the particular social group to which they belong, even when these are completely opposed to the media’s message.
  • The relative balance of the different sets of ideas in people’s heads changes with the ups and downs of the struggles they are forced into. So no opinion poll, however thorough, can grasp the full complexity of people’s ideas. The best that can be done is to give a glimpse of what the balance is like at any moment in time.
  • This is what the latest British Social Attitudes Report does.
  • It is fascinating reading despite these limitations. For it refutes most of the contentions about ‘authoritarian populism’.
  • It shows that on a whole range of important issues the shift in recent years has been away from right wing and reactionary positions.
  • Just to take a few examples:
  • On racism: only 15 percent of people say that racists should be allowed to teach 15 year olds and only 38 percent say they should be allowed to hold public meetings. Thirty four percent admitted to being “prejudiced” against people of other races, 65 percent claimed they were “not prejudiced at all”.
  • On welfare issues: 44 percent of people say unemployed benefits are too low and cause hardship as against 34 percent who say they are too high and discourage people seeking a job.
  • Forty five percent say the government should increase taxes and spend more on health, education and social benefits as against only 6 percent who accept the pure Thatcherite message of reducing taxes and spending less on health, education and social benefits.
  • On class: 28 percent of people see themselves as “middle class”, but 66 percent as “working class” (of which 19 percent say they are “upper working class”).
  • On abortion: 52 percent of men and 47 percent of women say that a woman should “be able to decide on her own whether to have a child” (33 percent of Catholics hold this view). Fifty four percent of people think an unmarried mother should be able to have an abortion if she wishes and 58 percent think that couples who cannot afford to have more children should be able to. Twelve percent more people favour abortion rights today than in 1983.
  • On sexual matters: half the population regard sex before marriage as not wrong, but 80 percent regard extra-marital sex as always or mostly wrong.
  • There are two issues on which the ‘moral majority’ really is the majority.
  • The first is that of the death penalty: 77 percent favour it for murder in the course of a terrorist act, 71 percent for murder of a police officer and 66 percent for other murders.
  • The other is homosexuality. Here people’s own experiences seem to have done less to break inherited prejudices than anywhere else.
  • Sixty nine percent believe sex with someone of the same sex is always or mostly wrong as against 16 percent who believe it is rarely or never wrong. And only 36 percent of people believe it is acceptable for a homosexual to be a school teacher as against 54 percent who think it is unacceptable.
  • The answers to both questions show a move to the right of about 5 percent since 1983 – presumably as a result of the media labelling AIDS as the ‘gay plague’.
  • But these two issues alone are not enough to even begin to justify the ‘authoritarian populist’ line.
  • That still leaves open an important question. If the basic values of so many people are still so different to those professed by the Thatcherite wing of the Tories, how come the Tories have been able to win two general elections and stand a fair chance of winning a third?
  • The simple answer is that the experience of Labour in office has not been such as to provide an antidote to Tory and Alliance propaganda for many workers. So fewer than half those who identified themselves as “working class” voted Labour in 1983.
  • One area illustrates this more than anything else – housing. Council house tenants were the traditional core of the Labour vote, and it has been they who have had the most immediate experience of long term Labour rule at the hands of the overwhelmingly Labour councils of the big cities.
  • The survey asked council tenants whether it was true that “councils give a poor standard of repairs and maintenance”. Sixty eight percent answered “yes”. It then asked them whether “council estates are generally a pleasant place to live in”. Forty five percent said “no” and 47 percent “yes”. Finally it asked them about their rent levels: 49 percent thought they were “on the high side”.
  • Given this level of dissatisfaction it is not surprising that some council tenants have opted for the Tory way out of buying their own homes. Nor is it surprising that other tenants do not, by and large, object: 61 percent think “council tenants should generally be allowed to buy their homes or flats” and only 9 percent think they should not be allowed to.
  • Labour’s willingness to balance budgets by imposing poor standards and high rents on what was once its captive voting force has driven most of them to accept a stereotyped Tory argument.

[Chris Harman, Socialist Worker Review, No.93, December 1986, pp.30-31. http://www.marxists.org/archive/harman/1986/12/attitudes.htm]

This entry was posted in politics, Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s